|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
title: "annotation of miscellany № 49: introducing the quasiquote – shady characters" |
|
|
|
|
|
layout: post |
|
|
|
|
|
category: responses |
|
|
|
|
|
tags: annotation |
|
|
|
|
|
replyto: "https://shadycharacters.co.uk/2014/06/miscellany-49-quasiquote/" |
|
|
|
|
|
date: "2021-12-04T06:56:08.036286+00:00" |
|
|
|
|
|
hypothesislink: "https://hyp.is/Qc8hmFTPEey7e_8PlKRpLg/shadycharacters.co.uk/2014/06/miscellany-49-quasiquote/" |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> ...erately combine characters. <em>“The interrobang was easily made with a back-space and over-type”, as Ned told me via email, which is remarkable in itself. But this quirk of typewriter operation also allowed the construction of the fabled quasiquote, where a hyphen and quotation mark were overstruck to produce something like "this", or 'this', and which encapsulated an abbreviated or [paraphrased](#paraphrasis) quotation rather a verbatim report of the speaker’s words.</em> |
|
|
|
|
|
Ned’s explanation of the qua... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have wanted just this punctuation mark! Lapsing into italics doesn't give quite the right meaning, since it overlaps with fictional *thoughts* and therefore tends to impute intent. |