|
|
@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
title: "annotation of [[sequential wiki]] - anagora.org" |
|
|
|
layout: post |
|
|
|
category: responses |
|
|
|
tags: annotation |
|
|
|
replyto: "https://anagora.org/sequential-wiki" |
|
|
|
date: "2022-01-17T06:11:29.509152+00:00" |
|
|
|
hypothesislink: "https://hyp.is/T3PoiHdcEeyVjqvZBnCEAQ/anagora.org/sequential-wiki" |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> ...<em>Sequential Wiki |
|
|
|
> Not a formal term, but I use it often. A sequential wiki is like a wiki page, but people contribute blocks of [[content]] instead of arbitrary fragments; and they maintain clear ownership and control over their blocks.</em> |
|
|
|
I call the [[agora]] a distribu... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an excellent *concept* but I'm not sold on the *name*, simply because part of what's so powerful about this kind of thing is that the possibilities for sequencing are wide open. Like with the experimental upranking in settings -- maybe what I want to see first are my social contacts' blocks, people I "follow". Or maybe I want to pull in a ranking service that has experts vet medical info and be able to uprank based on that. Or maybe I want to *most* of the time see something like one of the above, but sometimes surf the recent content just for fun. You know? "Sequential" makes me think the order is important, I guess, but that might be overly programmer-brained, and probably I'm coming at this with different metaphors than you had in mind. Curious to hear your thoughts! |